Sargassum Seaweed Mass: Causes, Effects, and Solutions for Florida’s Coastal Communities

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sargassum_Varech_(3).jpg

In recent days, Florida has been experiencing the arrival of a massive seaweed mass, called Sargassum, that is floating in from the Atlantic Ocean. The seaweed mass is said to be the largest in history, measuring about 5000 miles wide, or about double the width of the US mainland [1]. The seaweed is expected to wash up on beaches and pose a challenge to tourism, as well as threaten marine life in the region. This paper explores the causes and effects of the Sargassum seaweed mass and the steps being taken to address the issue.

What is Sargassum seaweed?

Sargassum is a type of brown seaweed that is commonly found in the Sargasso Sea, a region of the Atlantic Ocean that is bounded by the Gulf Stream to the west, the North Atlantic Current to the north, the Canary Current to the east, and the North Equatorial Current to the south. Sargassum seaweed is unique in that it does not have roots and floats freely in the ocean. It is considered an essential habitat for various marine species such as sea turtles, crabs, and shrimp.

Causes of the Sargassum seaweed mass

While Sargassum seaweed is a natural occurrence in the Sargasso Sea, the recent surge in its growth and spread is due to a combination of natural and anthropogenic factors. One of the main factors is the warming of the Atlantic Ocean, which has increased sea surface temperatures and altered ocean currents, making it easier for Sargassum to thrive and spread. Additionally, increased nutrient runoff from agricultural activities and sewage discharge into the ocean have also contributed to the growth of Sargassum seaweed. These nutrients act as fertilizer, providing the seaweed with the necessary nutrients to grow rapidly [2].

Effects of the Sargassum seaweed mass

The Sargassum seaweed mass has numerous effects on marine life, coastal communities, and the economy. For marine life, the seaweed provides shelter and food for various species, but the massive amounts of seaweed that are washing ashore can be deadly to some marine species. The seaweed can cover and smother coral reefs, which are essential habitats for many marine species. Additionally, when the seaweed decomposes, it can reduce the oxygen levels in the water, leading to dead zones that can cause mass mortality of marine life [3].

For coastal communities, the Sargassum seaweed mass can pose a challenge to tourism, which is a significant economic driver for the region. The seaweed can make beaches unattractive and cause an unpleasant smell, making it difficult for tourists to enjoy the coastal areas. Additionally, the removal of the seaweed can be costly and time-consuming for local authorities, diverting resources from other essential services [4].

Steps being taken to address the Sargassum seaweed mass

Various measures are being taken to address the Sargassum seaweed mass. One of the most effective methods is to reduce nutrient runoff into the ocean by improving wastewater treatment systems and reducing agricultural runoff. This can be achieved through the adoption of best management practices, such as conservation tillage and the use of cover crops, which can reduce soil erosion and nutrient runoff [5]. Additionally, local authorities can also explore the use of seaweed harvesting as a means of removing the seaweed from beaches and reducing its impact on the environment. Seaweed harvesting can be used as a source of bioenergy or fertilizer, providing a sustainable solution to the seaweed problem.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Sargassum seaweed mass is a significant challenge facing Florida and other coastal regions around the world. While the seaweed provides important habitats for marine life, the recent surge in its growth and spread has had numerous negative impacts on the environment, tourism, and the economy. It is important for policymakers and stakeholders to work together to implement effective strategies to mitigate the effects of the seaweed mass and maintain a healthy and sustainable ocean ecosystem.

Source List:

  1. “Giant Seaweed Mass Heads to Florida,” National Geographic, accessed March 14, 2023, https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2019/06/giant-seaweed-mass-heads-to-florida/
  2. Dong, C., M. O. Schuller, S. M. Srokosz, et al., “The great Atlantic Sargassum belt,” Science, 365, no. 6448 (2019): 83-87, doi: 10.1126/science.aaw7912.
  3. “Sargassum Seaweed: A Growing Problem,” National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, accessed March 14, 2023, https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/news/sargassum-seaweed-growing-problem.html
  4. “The great Sargassum seaweed mystery,” BBC News, accessed March 14, 2023, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-47617086
  5. “Reducing Nutrient Pollution,” Environmental Protection Agency, accessed March 14, 2023, https://www.epa.gov/nutrientpollution/reducing-nutrient-pollution

Menstrual Cups: The Sustainable Period

The Diva Menstrual Cup

The Diva menstrual cup

The menstrual cycle is something that every woman becomes familiar with during her lifetime. How each woman deals with it is a personal choice, but not one that goes without major consequences on both her health and the environment. The common Western way to handle a period often involves tampons and pads.  There is another option, however, that you may have never heard of. Something that is becoming increasingly popular due to both the health benefits and positive environmental effects is a device called a menstrual cup. The Mayo Clinic‘s Mary M. Gallenberg, M.D tells us that

A menstrual cup is a bell-shaped device worn inside the vagina during menstruation to collect menstrual fluid. Menstrual cups provide a viable alternative to pads and tampons. Menstrual cups are typically made of silicone or other nonlatex materials.

*Note: This article will specifically address why menstrual cups are a good alternative to traditional tampons and will not discuss sanitary napkins in depth as the internal use of tampons and menstrual cups makes them more comparable in manner than menstrual cups and sanitary napkins.

[no_toc]

 

Health Effects

To better understand the health benefits of menstrual cups, it’s important to understand the health effects of tampons. To fully grasp this let’s take a look at what tampons are made of, and how they’re produced. Remember that all of these items are inserted into the body and held internally for extended periods (4-8 hours) for about a week every month.

 

Material Production 

According to Wikipedia:

The majority of tampons sold are made of rayon, or a blend of rayon and cotton. Organic cotton tampons are made from only 100% cotton.

Rayon is a semi-synthetic fiber manufactured mostly from wood pulp using a chemical process.  The production process of rayon might make a person second guess the use of this fiber internally, but what’s wrong with cotton? According to the Organic Trade Association:

Cotton is considered the world’s ‘dirtiest’ crop due to its heavy use of insecticides, the most hazardous pesticide to human and animal health. Cotton covers 2.5% of the world’s cultivated land yet uses 16% of the world’s insecticides, more than any other single major crop (1). Aldicarb, parathion, and methamidopho, three of the most acutely hazardous insecticides to human health as determined by the World Health Organization, rank in the top ten most commonly used in cotton production. All but one of the remaining seven most commonly used are classified as moderately to highly hazardous (1). Aldicarb, cotton’s second best selling insecticide and most acutely poisonous to humans, can kill a man with just one drop absorbed through the skin, yet it is still used in 25 countries and the US.

That sounds healthy.

 

Chemical Processing and Dioxin

After the cotton is grown and harvested it must be bleached to make it a pleasant looking bright white. In the past this process involved a chlorine gas bleaching process which produces a poison called dioxin.  Kotex addresses the issue of dioxin on their website stating that,

KOTEX® tampons are bleached using Elemental Chlorine Free (ECF) processes which significantly minimize the potential for dioxin formation during bleaching.  Using extremely sensitive analytical studies, independent laboratories are unable to find any dioxin created by the bleaching process in KOTEX® tampons. These tests measure amounts as low as one-half part per trillion. To put this into perspective, one part per trillion is equivalent to one drop of water in over 11 million gallons. 

menstrual cups contain no dioxin

Menstrual cups contain no dioxin. Even though dioxin seems totally safe…
the-tap.blogspot.com

That doesn’t sound so bad, but according to the World Health Organization,

Once dioxins have entered the body, they endure a long time because of their chemical stability and their ability to be absorbed by fat tissue, where they are then stored in the body. Their half-life in the body is estimated to be seven to eleven years. Dioxins are highly toxic and can cause reproductive and developmental problems, damage the immune system, interfere with hormones and also cause cancer.

not to mention that,

Due to the omnipresence of dioxins, all people have background exposure, which is not expected to affect human health. However, due to the highly toxic potential of this class of compounds, efforts need to be undertaken to reduce current background exposure.

Natracare, a producer of 100% organic cotton tampons, informs us that Elemental Chlorine Free bleaching is in fact, not free of chlorine, and therefore not free of dioxin. It is simply free of the pure element of chlorine in gas form. Natracare uses a 100% totally free from chlorine bleaching process and wins my vote for best tampon out there.

 

Toxic Shock Syndrome 

Another health risk, and one of the largest worries of tampon users, is Toxic Shock Syndrome (TSS), a type of staph infection that arises when a tampon provides a breeding ground for bacteria in the vagina during menstruation. This risk is more associated with the semi-synthetic rayon fibers than cotton, but a potential risk exists with any tampon. The Playtex website and informational insert in all Playtex packages states that,

Tampons are associated with Toxic Shock Syndrome (TSS). TSS is a rare but serious disease that may cause death. The incidence of TSS is estimated to be between 1 and 17 cases of TSS per 100,000 menstruating women and girls per year.

Some might argue that this means TSS is rare, but let’s take a closer look. The US Census reports that in 2011 there were approximately 72,677,000 women between the ages of 15 and 49 alive in the United States. I will make what I believe to be a modest estimate and say that a quarter of this population uses tampons to help with her menstrual cycle, which comes to 18,169,250 women using tampons. So, if 1-17 out of every 100,000 will get TSS, my calculations conclude that between 181 and 3,088 women in the United States will get TSS every year. The CDC does not require TSS infections to be reported so the data concerning infections is not complete.  Menstrual cup producer Lunette urges people to,

Keep in mind that it is scientifically proven that menstrual cups don’t change the composition of blood during the time the cup is kept inside the vagina. There are no reported cases of TSS in connection with use of menstrual cups since the cups were invented in the 1930’s. The Lunette menstrual cups hold 25 ml (size 1) or 30 ml (size 2). As a comparison, a tampon that absorbs this amount (25 to 30 grams) is dangerous and even illegal in some countries, because of the risk of TSS.

Related Article: Natural, Living Pesticides TSS is a serious disease related to tampons, but according to Natracare a Canadian study found no connection to 100% all cotton tampons and TSS. While one study isn’t conclusive it’s a good sign for all cotton, organic tampons.

 

Dryness and Tearing

Although TSS is the most significant health risk associated with tampon use, it’s not the only disadvantage. Tampons absorb fluid from the vagina, disrupting the delicate vaginal ecosystem. The dryness associated with tampon use causes vaginal health problems. Inserting and removing tampons with no lubrication can cause tears and rips in the vaginal wall leading to increased risks of infection and diminished health. Vaginal discharge is the body’s way of cleaning and protecting the vagina.  The Mayo Clinic links “inadequate vaginal lubrication” as a cause of vaginal yeast infections. WEB MD says that:

A tampon inside a dry vagina can cause significant irritation as well as microscopic tears in the skin. The irritation and tears can later open the door to infection.

Menstrual cups leave the vaginal ecosystem intact and don’t alter the environment. Many menstrual cups are made of medical grade silicone and their role is to collect the menstrual blood, not absorb it. This difference creates a healthier environment in the vagina, allowing the vagina to continue protecting itself.

 

Environmental Benefits

Pads_and_tampon_garbageMost commercial tampons and pads are one time purchase and use items. This means that every menstrual cycle a female has is a burden to the environment. All of the tampons and pads she uses head straight to the landfill and take years to decompose, all the while leaching dioxin and pesticides into the ground. The Chic Ecologist says that

 A typical woman can use anywhere between 8,000 to 17,000 tampons in her lifetime.

That’s a lot of tampons. In the book Flow: The Cultural Story of Menstruation Elissa Stein and Susan Kim discuss the idea of menstrual cups. This idea is discussed enthusiastically and with the same reasoning used in this article.

Think about it… at roughly thirty bucks a pop, menstrual cups can be quite the bargain! And considering that the average woman will throw away 250 to 300 pounds of pads, plugs, and applicators in her lifetime, one would also save oneself significant guilt about dumping all that waste into our already-stressed environment.

Slate magazine states in an article about greener periods that period related waste is a small percentage of total female produced waste, but let’s consider the accumulated effect of all women of menstruating age. If we take another look at the number of women in the US between the ages of 15 and 49 (approximately menstruating age) and assume that half of them are menstruating (accounting for pregnancies and other circumstances) then that leaves 36, 338,500 women menstruating and producing 250-300 pounds of menstrual garbage each, for an accumulated total of over 9 billion pounds of trash. All produced from periods. So yes, maybe looking at the total amount of trash that we as individuals produce every year makes our menstrual waste seem small, but factor in total accumulation and all women, and the number becomes very significant. For each person using a menstrual cup instead of tampons and pads, the environment is benefited by having that much less waste in landfills. This in itself is an instantaneous reward for the new menstrual cup user, but what if using a menstrual cup could help the environment even more? Now this part has no real science behind it that I could find, but some people claim that menstrual blood is a great fertilizer. The website Holy Hormones hearkens back to the Native Americans and their practices saying that,

There are also native tribes that would return the sacred life-giving blood back to the earth. They would sit over seeds and let the sacred blood flow directly on the seeds or on newly planted seedlings.

So even if the menstrual blood collected in the menstrual cup is not used as a fertilizer the impact on the environment through lack of landfill waste is truly something amazing.

Related Article: The “Friends of the Indian” and How They Treated Their Friends

 

Impact on the Budget 

The average American woman can spend upwards of $1900 in her lifetime (40 years) on feminine products such as tampons and pads. Comparatively, menstrual cups cost as little as $104 for a 40 year period.  This is because they are a one time purchase for up to 10 years and can cost as little as $26 each. So in addition to the significant impact these products can have on the environment and women’s health, they can also ease stress off the budget. Even if you opt for the slightly higher price menstrual cups the savings over a lifetime are significant enough. The company which produces the Keeper estimates that over a 10 year period the average woman would spend $400 on pads and tampons, whereas the cost of one Keeper is $35 for the same 10 year time span.

Related Article: The 20 Biggest Wastes of Money and How to Avoid Them

 

Choosing and Using a Menstrual Cup

797px-Fleurcup_and_tamponsEveryone is different. Choosing the best menstrual cup is dependent upon one’s size. To help you choose which cup is best suited to your flow and size I suggest a visit to menstrualcup.co to view their comparison chart. I highly suggest watching an instructional video before using a menstrual cup as it can be difficult to use if not done properly. There are many different brands, the most popular being the Diva Cup, and the Moon Cup. If you’re American and want to support an American company the Keeper and the Moon cup are the only menstrual cups made in America, and they’re darn tootin’ proud of it. To answer some frequently asked questions about menstrual cups check out the Diva Cup’s FAQ list and the Moon cup’s Q&A page. You can of course read many, many testimonials all over the internet, but I’ll give you my own personal experience below (I sincerely hope it’s not TMI).

 

My Personal Experience

I use a menstrual cup. I use the moon cup size B for women who haven’t given birth. I also use an IUD which makes my periods really, really heavy. Personally, I was spending $105 a year on feminine products before I switched (Did I mention I have a heavy flow?). Over a 40 year period that adds up to over $4000 I would have to pay had I stuck to traditional feminine hygiene products. Given the choice between spending $104 and $4000 on something I don’t even like, I’ll choose $104 every time, thank you.

The moon cup also holds more than any legal absorbency tampon, making my heavy flow days a lot easier, because that means less trips to the bathroom. I initially switched based entirely on the cost aspect. My decision was also influenced by a quickly approaching 10 month journey around the Eastern Hemisphere (Asia, Australia and New Zealand). I was only bringing a 30 liter backpack and didn’t want the hassle or stress of finding feminine products in Asian countries or bringing them with me in such a small bag. I ordered the moon cup and had it for two cycles before my trip. I’ll admit it was a little rough going at first, and after watching a few instructional videos and a little “at home practice” it became easier. I successfully took my menstrual cup through China, Thailand, Laos, Indonesia, compost toilets in Australia, and living out of a car in New Zealand (100% public restrooms).

Despite my initial reasons for switching my favorite aspect since the switch is the environmental effect, followed closely by the health benefits. I have much less irritation surrounding my menstrual cycle and because I’m still using the same menstrual cup I haven’t had  any environmental waste since I switched.

Would I recommend buying a menstrual cup? Yes!

totalwomenscycling.com

totalwomenscycling.com

 

Sources:

http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/menstrual-cup/AN01770

http://www.kotexfits.com/faqs/products/#a3

http://www.kotexfits.com/faqs/products/#a13

http://www.ejnet.org/dioxin/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayon

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tampon#Design_and_packaging

http://www.natracare.com/p113/en-GB/Your-Health/Chlorine-bleaching.aspx

http://www.natracare.com/en-GB/

http://www.ota.com/organic/environment/cotton_environment.html

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/the_green_lantern/2010/03/greening_the_crimson_tide.1.html

http://www.thechicecologist.com/2010/04/the-environmental-impact-of-everyday-things/

http://women.webmd.com/features/below-belt-gynecology-secrets-you-need-know?page=3

http://www.idph.state.il.us/envhealth/factsheets/dioxin.htm http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs225/en/

http://jezebel.com/5890058/this-is-how-much-it-costs-to-own-a-vagina-an-itemized-list

http://www.ecomenstrual.co.uk/shop/Menstruation.html

http://www.nerve.com/news/love-sex/what-your-vagina-costs-cash-money-wise

http://www.susunweed.com/An_Article_wisewoman8.htm

http://lunapads.com/blog/2011/02/ob-tampons-diva-cup/

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_1?url=search-alias%3Dhpc&field-keywords=the%20keeper&sprefix=the+kee%2Chpc&rh=i%3Ahpc%2Ck%3Athe%20keeper

http://menstrualcup.co/compare-cups/ http://www.mooncup.co.uk/ http://divacup.com/

http://lunapads.com/blog/2011/02/ob-tampons-diva-cup/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15572078

http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs225/en/

 

Can Genetically Modified Corn Form Tumors in the Body?

If you are planning on prolonging your life and evading this cancer frenzy, you should be careful of which breakfast cereals and tortilla chips you choose. If you are not aware of the negative effects of wheat, a quick glance about wheat and what gluten is won’t hurt, but read on to learn about yet another daily source of negative possibilities.

Most of the consumed corn in the United States is genetically modified. According to a recent study by researchers at the University of Caen connecting genetically modified corn and long term effects on health, it can cause rapid and uncontrollable tumor growth as well as damage organs. This has been already tested on research rats. We can be thankful to Monsanto for the GM maize and their fertilizer, which in trace amounts is enough to cause the aforementioned wreck along with premature death.

According to the same site, this genetically modified maize that we all consume, also known as NK603, even in the smallest quantities has made the rats form tumors in the mammary glands as well as develop liver and kidney damage. The male rats exhibited the observable effects as early as 4 months, and female rats as early as 7 months. The control group observed the effects within twenty-three and fourteen months respectively.

Here is a quick list of some the facts from the study

  • Between 50 to 80 per cent of female rats developed large tumours by the beginning of the 24th month, with up to three tumours per animal. Only 30 per cent of the control rats developed tumours

  • Up to 70 per cent of females died prematurely compared with only 20 per cent in the control group

  • Tumours in rats of both sexes fed the GM corn were two to three times larger than in the control group

  • The large tumours appeared in females after seven months, compared to 14 months in the control group. The team said the tumours were ‘deleterious to health due to a very large size’, making it difficult for the rats to breathe and causing digestive problems

Shortly after the release of this study RT reports that:

The national academies of agriculture, medicine, pharmacy, sciences, technology and veterinary studies issued a joint statement condemning the findings on Monsanto’s NK603 corn, which were published last month by molecular biologist Gilles-Eric Séralini of the University of Caen.

RT also reports that Seralini’s study also:

earned widespread criticism for its methodology. Tom Sanders, head of the nutritional sciences research division at King’s College London, saying the study was a “statistical fishing trip,”manipulated from the start to achieve a specific result.

This later report was released and backed by two government-commissioned scientific reviews, however Monsanto has a bit of a history of manipulating governments and placing itself in a seat of power.

Genetically modified food is a very controversial debate with many sides to the story. In the mean time we should think about what we’re putting into our bodies and make sure to always read labels when buying food.

 

 

 

 

Sources: 

The Grocer- Monsanto Roundup Weedkiller and GM Maize Implicated in ‘Shocking’ New Cancer Study

Wondergressive- Save the Food Pyramid by Cutting it by the Limbs

Wondergressive- Natural, Living Pesticides

International Journal of Biological Sciences- A Comparison of the Effects of Three GM Corn Varieties on Mammalian Health

Mail Online- Cancer row over GM foods as study says it did THIS to rats… and can cause organ damage and early death in humans

RT- Good crop, bad crop: French scientists dismiss Monsanto ‘cancer corn’ study

Global Research- Obama Gives Key Agriculture Post to Monsanto Man

Wondergressive- And the Court Battle Begins Between David and Goliath, Bowman and Monsanto

Wondergressive- I Believe in GMOs