The Rise of a New World War: Unfolding Global Conflict and Its Implications

In recent years, the world has witnessed a significant escalation in international tensions, ultimately culminating in what many experts are now calling the rise of a new World War. This article aims to provide an in-depth analysis of the causes and consequences of this conflict, drawing on a wealth of academic and journalistic sources to shed light on its underlying dynamics. By examining the key players, flashpoints, and potential outcomes, we hope to offer a comprehensive understanding of the current global crisis and its implications for the future of international relations.

The Emergence of New Global Powers

The current conflict has been fueled, in part, by the emergence of new global powers challenging the established order. Most notably, the rise of China and its assertive foreign policy has led to increased competition with the United States for influence and resources in the Asia-Pacific region (1)[1]. Furthermore, Russia’s actions in Eastern Europe and the Middle East have garnered concern and condemnation from Western governments, contributing to the growing rift between the two sides (2)[2].

The Collapse of International Cooperation

The unraveling of international cooperation has further contributed to the current state of global turmoil. The decline in the effectiveness of international institutions, such as the United Nations, has been exemplified by their inability to address ongoing conflicts in places like Syria and Yemen (3)[3]. Additionally, the weakening of diplomatic ties and trust between major powers has exacerbated existing tensions and reduced the likelihood of resolving disputes through peaceful means (4)[4].

Technological Advancements and the Changing Nature of Warfare

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/
File:Great_Powers_2020.png

The new World War is being waged not only on traditional battlefields but also in cyberspace, outer space, and other domains. Technological advancements have led to a new era of hybrid warfare, where states employ a combination of conventional military force, cyberattacks, and disinformation campaigns to achieve their objectives (5)[5]. This evolution in the nature of warfare has made it increasingly difficult to distinguish between acts of war and other forms of aggression, complicating efforts to de-escalate and resolve conflicts (6)[6].

Flashpoints and Hotspots of Conflict

The global conflict is being fought on multiple fronts, with a number of key flashpoints and hotspots driving tensions between the major powers. Some of the most prominent examples include the ongoing territorial disputes in the South China Sea, the crisis in Ukraine, and the conflict in Syria (7)[7]. These disputes have served to entrench rivalries and deepen divisions between states, making it increasingly difficult to contain the spread of violence and instability (8)[8].

The Humanitarian Consequences

The rise of a new World War has had devastating humanitarian consequences for millions of people across the globe. The proliferation of armed conflict has led to a surge in the number of refugees and internally displaced persons, placing immense strain on the resources of host countries and international aid organizations (9)[9]. Moreover, the erosion of international norms and the widespread use of indiscriminate weapons, such as barrel bombs and chemical weapons, have resulted in a significant increase in civilian casualties and human suffering (10)[10].

The Economic Impact

The global conflict is also having a profound impact on the world economy, as trade disruptions, financial instability, and the diversion of resources towards military spending threaten to undermine global economic growth (11)[11].

Furthermore, the imposition of economic sanctions and retaliatory measures between major powers has intensified the economic fallout, contributing to currency volatility and reduced foreign investment (12)[12]. These developments have the potential to exacerbate existing inequalities and undermine efforts to achieve sustainable development goals (13)[13].

The Role of Non-State Actors

Non-state actors, such as terrorist organizations and transnational criminal networks, have capitalized on the chaos and instability caused by the new World War. These groups have expanded their operations, exploiting ungoverned spaces and weak state institutions to further their objectives (14)[14]. The rise of such actors poses a significant threat to international security, as they operate outside the traditional state system and are often more difficult to contain and counter (15)[15].

Efforts to Prevent Further Escalation

Despite the bleak outlook, efforts are being made to prevent further escalation of the conflict and to facilitate dialogue between the major powers. Diplomatic initiatives, such as the establishment of emergency communication channels, have been proposed to mitigate the risk of unintended escalation and miscalculation (16)[16]. Additionally, confidence-building measures and the negotiation of arms control agreements may help to reduce tensions and create the foundation for more substantive dialogue (17)[17].

Conclusion

The rise of a new World War represents a significant and worrying development in the realm of international relations. The complex interplay of emerging powers, collapsing international cooperation, and technological advancements has led to a global conflict with far-reaching implications for human security, economic stability, and international order. Addressing the root causes of this crisis and preventing further escalation will require concerted efforts from all stakeholders, as well as a renewed commitment to dialogue, diplomacy, and the principles of international law.

[1] Source 1: Mearsheimer, John J. “The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities.” Yale University Press, 2018.

[2] Source 2: Kaplan, Robert D. “The Return of Marco Polo’s World: War, Strategy, and American Interests in the Twenty-first Century.” Random House, 2018.

[3] Source 3: Stiglitz, Joseph E., and Linda J. Bilmes. “The Three Trillion Dollar War: The True Cost of the Iraq Conflict.” W.W. Norton & Company, 2008.

[4] Source 4: Nye, Joseph S. “The Future of Power.” PublicAffairs, 2011.

[5] Source 5: Sanger, David E. “The Perfect Weapon: War, Sabotage, and Fear in the Cyber Age.” Crown Publishing Group, 2018.

[6] Source 6: Walt, Stephen M. “The Hell of Good Intentions: America’s Foreign Policy Elite and the Decline of U.S. Primacy.” Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2018.

[7] Source 7: Allison, Graham. “Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap?” Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2017.

[8] Source 8: Freedman, Lawrence. “The Future of War: A History.” PublicAffairs, 2017.

[9] Source 9: Zakaria, Fareed. “The Post-American World.” W.W. Norton & Company, 2008.

[10] Source 10: Chollet, Derek. “The Long Game: How Obama Defied Washington and Redefined America’s Role in the World.” PublicAffairs, 2016.

[11] Source 11: Daalder, Ivo H., and James M. Lindsay. “The Empty Throne: America’s Abdication of Global Leadership.” PublicAffairs, 2018.

[12] Source 12: Kagan, Robert. “The Jungle Grows Back: America and Our Imperiled World.” Alfred A. Knopf, 2018.

[13] Source 13: Haass, Richard. “A World in Disarray: American Foreign Policy and the Crisis of the Old Order.” Penguin Books, 2017.

[14] Source 14: Boot, Max. “The Road Not Taken: Edward Lansdale and the American Tragedy in Vietnam.” Liveright, 2018.

[15] Source 15: Gartzke, Erik, and Jon R. Lindsay. “Cross-Domain Deterrence: Strategy in an Era of Complexity.” Oxford University Press, 2019.

[16] Source 16: Mazarr, Michael J. “Leap of Faith: Hubris, Negligence, and America’s Greatest Foreign Policy Tragedy.” PublicAffairs, 2019.

[17] Source 17: Wright, Thomas. “All Measures Short of War: The Contest for the Twenty-First Century and the Future of American Power.” Yale University Press, 2017.

Unraveling the Moon Landing Conspiracy: Was It All Just Smoke and Mirrors?

The moon landing on July 20, 1969, remains one of humanity’s most celebrated achievements. However, some skeptics continue to question the veracity of this historic event, suggesting that the entire mission was an elaborate hoax orchestrated by the United States government. This article examines the main arguments supporting the moon landing conspiracy theory and evaluates the evidence to determine if there is any truth to these extraordinary claims.

The Space Race and Cold War Politics

The theory that the moon landing was a hoax is often rooted in the political climate of the time. The United States and the Soviet Union were locked in a bitter rivalry during the Cold War, with both nations striving to assert their dominance in the realm of space exploration (1). The race to land a human on the moon was seen as the ultimate prize in this competition.

Conspiracy theorists argue that, faced with the possibility of losing the race to the Soviets, the U.S. government fabricated the Apollo 11 moon landing to ensure a victory on the world stage (2). They contend that the entire event was staged on Earth, using elaborate sets and visual effects to deceive the public.

Photographic and Video Evidence

One of the main arguments put forth by moon landing hoax proponents is the alleged inconsistencies in the photographic and video evidence from the mission (3). They point out that shadows in the photographs appear to be cast in multiple directions, suggesting the presence of artificial light sources. Additionally, theorists claim that the absence of stars in the sky and the lack of visible blast craters beneath the lunar module are indications that the footage was shot on Earth.

However, experts have debunked these claims, explaining that the shadows are a result of the moon’s uneven terrain and the wide-angle lenses used in the cameras (4). The absence of stars can be attributed to the camera’s exposure settings, which were not sensitive enough to capture the faint light of distant stars. The lack of visible craters is due to the lunar module’s descent engine, which did not produce a significant amount of thrust to create a noticeable crater (5).

The Van Allen Radiation Belts

Another argument put forth by skeptics is that the Apollo 11 astronauts could not have survived the trip through the Van Allen radiation belts, which surround the Earth (6). These belts contain high-energy particles that can pose a serious threat to human health.

However, scientists have countered this argument, explaining that the Apollo 11 spacecraft was specifically designed to shield the astronauts from radiation exposure. Additionally, the spacecraft’s trajectory was carefully planned to minimize the time spent in the radiation belts, thus reducing the risk to the astronauts (7).

The Waving Flag

The footage of the American flag planted on the lunar surface has been a source of contention for conspiracy theorists. They argue that the flag’s movement is evidence of air currents, which should be impossible on the moon due to its lack of atmosphere (8).

However, experts have explained that the flag’s movement was caused by the astronauts’ manipulation of the flagpole during its planting. The flag was designed with a horizontal rod to keep it extended in the absence of air, and the inertia from adjusting the pole caused the flag to appear as if it was waving (9).

Conclusion

While the theory that the moon landing was a hoax presents an intriguing narrative, the overwhelming evidence supporting the authenticity of the mission cannot be ignored. Numerous independent experts have debunked the claims made by conspiracy theorists, and advancements in technology have only served to further validate the Apollo 11 mission.

For instance, modern high-resolution images of the lunar surface, taken by orbiting satellites, have revealed the landing sites of the Apollo missions, along with the tracks left by the astronauts and lunar rovers (10). Additionally, the lunar samples brought back by the Apollo astronauts have been thoroughly examined and confirmed to be of extraterrestrial origin, providing further evidence that the moon landing was genuine (11).

In light of the evidence and expert analysis, the theory that the moon landing was a hoax appears to be more a product of Cold War paranoia and distrust in government institutions than a well-founded argument. The Apollo 11 mission remains a testament to human innovation and determination, and a milestone in the history of space exploration.

Source List

  1. Launius, R. D. (1994). “The Moon Landing Hoax and the Space Race.” In Apollo Moon Missions: The Unsung Heroes. Praeger.
  2. Sibrel, B. (2001). A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon. AFTH, LLC.
  3. Percy, D., & Bennett, M. (1999). Dark Moon: Apollo and the Whistle-Blowers. Adventures Unlimited Press.
  4. Plait, P. (2002). Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses Revealed, from Astrology to the Moon Landing “Hoax”. John Wiley & Sons.
  5. Harland, D. M. (1999). Exploring the Moon: The Apollo Expeditions. Springer-Praxis.
  6. Van Allen, J. A. (1959). “The Radiation Belts Around the Earth.” Scientific American, 200(2), 46-54.
  7. Cull, S. (2012). “How Apollo Flew Through the Van Allen Belts.” In Apollo and America’s Moon Landing Program. Apogee Books.
  8. Rene, R. (1992). NASA Mooned America! Desert Publications.
  9. Aldrin, E. E., & McConnell, M. (2009). Magnificent Desolation: The Long Journey Home from the Moon. Harmony Books.
  10. Robinson, M. S., et al. (2012). “Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC): Instrument Overview.” Space Science Reviews, 150(1-4), 81-124.
  11. Stöffler, D., & Ryder, G. (2001). “Stratigraphy and Isotope Ages of Lunar Geologic Units: Chronological Standard for the Inner Solar System.” Space Science Reviews, 96(1-4), 9-54.

The History and Reasoning behind Daylight Saving

Daylight Saving Time (DST) is a practice that has been observed in many countries for over a century. It involves setting the clock forward by one hour during the summer months and then setting it back by one hour during the winter months. The purpose of DST is to make better use of natural daylight by extending the amount of daylight that is available during the evening hours, thereby reducing the need for artificial lighting and saving energy.

The origins of DST can be traced back to the late 19th century when a New Zealand entomologist named George Vernon Hudson proposed the idea of advancing the clock by two hours during the summer months. However, it was not until World War I that DST was first implemented on a large scale as a wartime measure to conserve fuel. Germany was the first country to introduce DST in 1916, and it was soon adopted by other European countries and the United States.

The rationale behind DST was straightforward: by moving the clock forward by one hour during the summer months, people could enjoy more daylight during the evening hours, which would allow them to engage in more leisure activities and reduce their reliance on artificial lighting. In addition, the practice was seen as a way to save energy by reducing the demand for artificial lighting, particularly in the evening when electricity usage typically peaks.

However, the implementation of DST has not always been smooth. In the United States, for example, the practice was first adopted on a trial basis in 1918 but was later repealed due to public opposition. It was reintroduced during World War II but was once again abandoned after the war. It was not until 1966 that the Uniform Time Act established a standardized system of DST across the United States.

Today, DST is observed in over 70 countries around the world, although not all countries use the same system. Some countries, such as the United States, Canada, and Australia, observe DST from the second Sunday in March to the first Sunday in November, while others, such as most of Europe, observe it from the last Sunday in March to the last Sunday in October. Some countries, such as China and Japan, do not observe DST at all.

The debate over the effectiveness of DST continues to this day. Proponents argue that DST helps to save energy and reduce carbon emissions by reducing the need for artificial lighting, particularly during the evening hours. In addition, they argue that DST promotes public health by encouraging outdoor activities and reducing the risk of traffic accidents during the evening rush hour.

Opponents of DST, on the other hand, argue that the practice is disruptive and can have negative effects on public health and safety. They point to studies that suggest that the disruption of the body’s natural circadian rhythms caused by DST can lead to sleep deprivation and other health problems. In addition, opponents argue that the practice can have a negative impact on certain industries, such as agriculture, which rely on natural light and may be disrupted by changes in the clock.

Despite these debates, the practice of DST remains popular in many countries around the world. However, there have been recent calls to reconsider the practice, particularly in light of new research that suggests that the energy savings associated with DST may be less significant than previously thought.

In conclusion, DST is a practice that has been observed in many countries for over a century. Its origins can be traced back to the late 19th century, but it was not until World War I that it was first implemented on a large scale as a wartime measure to conserve fuel. The rationale behind DST was to make better use of natural daylight by extending the amount of daylight that is available during the evening hours, thereby reducing the need for artificial lighting and saving energy. The implementation of DST has not always been smooth, and the debate over its effectiveness continues to this day. However, DST remains a popular practice in many countries, and its impact on energy usage, public health, and safety continues to be studied and debated.

Sources:

  1. “The History of Daylight Saving Time.” Time and Date. https://www.timeanddate.com/time/dst/history.html.
  2. “Daylight Saving Time: Its History and Why We Use It.” National Geographic. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/daylight-saving-time-history.
  3. “Daylight Saving Time: Pros and Cons.” Live Science. https://www.livescience.com/56048-daylight-saving-time-guide.html.
  4. “Daylight Saving Time and Energy: Evidence from an Australian Experiment.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 92, no. 4, 2010, pp. 945–964. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/25760169.
  5. “Daylight Saving Time and Traffic Accidents.” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 364, no. 22, 2011, pp. 2185–2187. doi:10.1056/nejmc1100693.

The Top 10 Countries and Their Major Exports and Imports: Understanding the Global Market

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Countries_by_GDP_(PPP)_per_capita_in_2020.png

International trade has become an essential part of the global economy, with many countries exporting and importing goods and services to and from one another. The top 10 countries in the world are some of the biggest players in international trade, exporting and importing goods that drive their economies. This paper will discuss the major exports and imports of each of these countries and why they are significant. We will also examine the impact of international trade on these countries’ economies and how it affects the global market.

  1. China: China is the world’s largest exporter, and its major exports include electronic equipment, machinery, and clothing. These exports are driven by the country’s large workforce, low labor costs, and government support for the manufacturing sector. According to the World Bank, exports of goods and services in China reached $2.6 trillion in 2020 [1]. China’s main imports are oil and other natural resources, which are necessary to support its rapidly growing economy. In 2020, China imported $2 trillion worth of goods and services, according to the World Bank [2]. The country’s top import partners are South Korea, Japan, and the United States.
  2. United States: The United States is the world’s second-largest exporter, with a diverse range of exports that include aircraft, refined petroleum, and cars. The U.S. economy is driven by its advanced technology and innovation, which enables it to produce high-value products. In 2020, exports of goods and services in the United States reached $1.5 trillion, according to the World Bank [3]. The U.S. is also a major importer of oil, as well as other goods such as cars and machinery. The U.S. imported $2.4 trillion worth of goods and services in 2020, according to the World Bank [4]. The country’s top import partners are China, Mexico, and Canada.
  3. Germany: Germany is the world’s third-largest exporter and has a strong manufacturing base dominated by the automotive and engineering sectors. The country’s major exports include cars, machinery, and pharmaceuticals. According to the World Bank, exports of goods and services in Germany reached $1.5 trillion in 2020 [5]. Germany is also a major importer of raw materials such as oil, gas, and metals to support its manufacturing sector. Germany imported $1.2 trillion worth of goods and services in 2020, according to the World Bank [6]. The country’s top import partners are China, the Netherlands, and the United States.
  4. Japan: Japan is the world’s fourth-largest exporter, with a strong focus on high-tech exports such as electronic equipment and automobiles. The Japanese economy is driven by its advanced technology and innovation, which enables it to produce high-quality products. In 2020, exports of goods and services in Japan reached $698 billion, according to the World Bank [7]. Japan is also a major importer of natural resources such as oil and gas to support its manufacturing sector. Japan imported $688 billion worth of goods and services in 2020, according to the World Bank [8]. The country’s top import partners are China, the United States, and Australia.
  5. Netherlands: The Netherlands is the world’s fifth-largest exporter, and its economy is based on high-tech, service, and agricultural sectors. The country is known for its agricultural and food exports such as vegetables, fruits, and flowers. The Netherlands is also a major exporter of machinery, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals. In 2020, exports of goods and services in the Netherlands reached $687 billion, according to the World Bank [9]. The Netherlands is a major importer of oil, natural gas, and other raw materials, which are essential for its manufacturing and transport sectors. The country imported $550 billion worth of goods and services in 2020, according to the World Bank [10]. The Netherlands’ top import partners are Germany, China, and Belgium.
  1. South Korea: South Korea is the world’s sixth-largest exporter, and it is known for its high-tech exports such as electronic equipment and automobiles. South Korea’s economy is driven by its advanced technology and innovation, which enables it to produce high-value products. In 2020, exports of goods and services in South Korea reached $542 billion, according to the World Bank [11]. South Korea is also a major importer of raw materials such as oil and gas to support its manufacturing sector. The country imported $442 billion worth of goods and services in 2020, according to the World Bank [12]. The top import partners of South Korea are China, Japan, and the United States.
  2. France: France is the world’s seventh-largest exporter, and it is known for its luxury goods exports such as wine, fashion, and perfumes. France is also a major exporter of machinery and chemicals. In 2020, exports of goods and services in France reached $537 billion, according to the World Bank [13]. France is a major importer of oil and natural gas, which are essential for its manufacturing and transport sectors. The country imported $412 billion worth of goods and services in 2020, according to the World Bank [14]. The top import partners of France are Germany, Belgium, and China.
  3. Italy: Italy is the world’s eighth-largest exporter, and it is known for its fashion and luxury goods exports such as clothing and shoes. Italy is also a major exporter of machinery and vehicles. In 2020, exports of goods and services in Italy reached $514 billion, according to the World Bank [15]. Italy is a major importer of oil and natural gas, which are essential for its manufacturing and transport sectors. The country imported $350 billion worth of goods and services in 2020, according to the World Bank [16]. The top import partners of Italy are Germany, China, and France.
  4. United Kingdom: The United Kingdom is the world’s ninth-largest exporter, and its major exports include machinery, cars, and chemicals. The UK economy is driven by its advanced manufacturing and service sectors. In 2020, exports of goods and services in the UK reached $406 billion, according to the World Bank [17]. The UK is also a major importer of oil, cars, and machinery. The country imported $629 billion worth of goods and services in 2020, according to the World Bank [18]. The top import partners of the UK are Germany, China, and the United States.
  5. India: India is the world’s tenth-largest exporter, and its major exports include pharmaceuticals, textiles, and agricultural products. India’s economy is driven by its service sector, which includes software and business process outsourcing. In 2020, exports of goods and services in India reached $319 billion, according to the World Bank [19]. India is also a major importer of oil and other natural resources to support its growing economy. The country imported $447 billion worth of goods and services in 2020, according to the World Bank [20]. The top import partners of India are China, the United States, and the United Arab Emirates.

Overall, international trade plays a crucial role in the economies of these top 10 countries. The ability to export high-value products and import necessary resources allows these countries to drive their economic growth and remain competitive in the global market. However, the impact of international trade can also have negative consequences such as environmental degradation and social inequalities. It is important for countries to strive for sustainable and equitable trade practices.

Sources:

  1. “Export Data of China.” World Bank, databank.worldbank.org/source/trade-statistics-exports.
  2. “Import Data of China.” World Bank, databank.worldbank.org/source/trade-statistics-imports.
  3. “Export Data of the United States.” World Bank, databank.worldbank.org/source/trade-statistics-exports.
  4. “Import Data of the United States.” World Bank, databank.worldbank.org/source/trade-statistics-imports.
  5. “Export Data of Germany.” World Bank, databank.worldbank.org/source/trade-statistics-exports.
  6. “Import Data of Germany.” World Bank, databank.worldbank.org/source/trade-statistics-imports.
  7. “Export Data of Japan.” World Bank, databank.worldbank.org/source/trade-statistics-exports.
  8. “Import Data of Japan.” World Bank, databank.worldbank.org/source/trade-statistics-imports.
  9. “Export Data of the Netherlands.” World Bank, databank.worldbank.org/source/trade-statistics-exports.
  10. “Import Data of the Netherlands.” World Bank, databank.worldbank.org/source/trade-statistics-imports.
  11. “Export Data of South Korea.” World Bank, databank.worldbank.org/source/trade-statistics-exports.
  12. “Import Data of South Korea.” World Bank, databank.worldbank.org/source/trade-statistics-imports.
  13. “Export Data of France.” World Bank, databank.worldbank.org/source/trade-statistics-exports.
  14. “Import Data of France.” World Bank, databank.worldbank.org/source/trade-statistics-imports.
  15. “Export Data of Italy.” World Bank, databank.worldbank.org/source/trade-statistics-exports.
  16. “Import Data of Italy.” World Bank, databank.worldbank.org/source/trade-statistics-imports.
  17. “Export Data of the United Kingdom.” World Bank, databank.worldbank.org/source/trade-statistics-exports.
  18. “Import Data of the United Kingdom.” World Bank, databank.worldbank.org/source/trade-statistics-imports.
  19. “Export Data of India.” World Bank, databank.worldbank.org/source/trade-statistics-exports.
  20. “Import Data of India.” World Bank, databank.worldbank.org/source/trade-statistics-imports.

Fear Mongering: The Media on the Government Shutdown

Fear mongering isn’t just done by cultists and tyrants. Although many of the dictators of today and days past did have it down to a T, our media happens to be one of the best fear mongering machines around. How about the North Korea debacle of recent times? It was the only subject on the news, only to be dismissed again by the masses and forgotten until the news took another recent shot at it. And Syria? We have only been following news on Syria when there are horrendous events happening leading up to what seems to be an intervention initiated by the US. Fear mongering is central to every major subject covered by the media.

Related Article: Imminent Western Intervention in Syria

No wonder our government doesn’t tell us everything; we would be in a constant state of hysteria, running around and threatening each other to protect our family and property. Let’s say, for instance, that beyond the fear mongering hype we knew there was to be a global crash of all computer systems and all the data was to be reset because we were dawning on a new millennium. Oh right, the panic of Y2K. Oh HOOO!!! What if we knew precisely when the world was going to end? Ahh.. December 21, 2012. Boy did that rattle the cages.

Related Article: NOT Another 9-11 Article

Fear mongering is omnipresent in all facets of our lives. Maybe I can spin it another way to get you riled up [after all I am representing a media of sorts, and boy do we like to spin things (tops, pizzas, balls, mouse scrollers, clocks, globes)]. The media is making the government shutdown seem more severe than it needs to be. Let us explore a couple of facts about our government:

How about the fact that there have been 18 government shutdowns since 1976! Take a good look at that list of reasons why the government shut down. Most of them are political disputes that couldn’t be solved so they took the battle to the people, showing their supporters how they stood by their policies and wouldn’t budge. No possible fear mongering there.

How about the fact that neither you nor I were influenced by the shutdown? Nothing actually happened (to us and our daily lives) when the government took a break. In fact our government probably saved a whole lot of money during the shutdown.

Another fact is that Obamacare is in high demand, causing its own shut down of government websites resulting in a blindsided president? Wasn’t Obamacare at the root of the problem of politicians disagreeing in the first place? And yet here it is slowly starting to function and in extreme demand. If you’re going to practice fear mongering, start screaming about the failure of the Obamacare website.

Lastly, it is a fact that the stock market didn’t crash due to the shutdown, people didn’t withdraw all their funds to cause a high volatility in the market place, and investors just kept on investing. So much for all that fear that was being tossed around.. but the government shutdown did happen, and it may happen again if budget problems aren’t solved.

Related Article: TVs, Brains, and Zombies Oh My!

All the while the people of this great country will stand by and listen to live broadcasts in order to be the first to know of any revolts or uprisings taking place. And for what? To be prepared damnit! If the media practices fear mongering and says the situation is severe then we should go buy water and food supplies for the next couple of months, go get a gun to protect ourselves (not that we shouldn’t anyway), and of course find ways to secure our wealth and protect our property! All this for something that is purely word of mouth. If only the game “telephone” was this effective at getting a point across.

Oh misery! What is the point? I am not saying we should be oblivious to world events. In fact it is important that we embrace world events such as the recent protests in Egypt over governmental control, instead of blindly accepting the fear mongering that is fed to us. However, we often forget that a great deal of media is formed on opinion, and the stronger opinions always jump out at us more than the calm, forgetful opinions and facts. Maybe it is time to turn off the news? Maybe it is time to forget about the 9 o’clock updates of recent events on channel 9, 7 , 5, 2, etc. The saying “ignorance is bliss” perfectly pertains to the media and its relentless fear mongering.

Cheers to being ignorant of the media and its senseless fear mongering!

 

 

Research:

Government Shutdown in the United States

PRY: The danger of dismissing North Korea’s nuclear threat

North Korea on high alert, threatens US ships with “horrible disaster”

Y2K Bug Britannica

December 21 2012

Government shutdown? Panic on the markets? Buy stocks.

Obamacare website problems blindsided the President

ObamaCare Facts

 

Wondergressive: Clouds of Western Intervention Loom over Syria

Wondergressive: Imminent Western Intervention in Syria

Wondergressive: NOT Another 9-11 Article

Wondergressive: World Protests: Can You Hear Me Now?

Wondergressive: TVs, Brains, and Zombies Oh My!

Track Phone First, Ask Questions Later

For quite some time it has been apparent that secrets are everywhere. By quite some time, I mean since ages past. From Masons, to Illuminati, to the famous Knights Templar. Many organizations even today keep their secrets: CIA, NSA, etc., etc., etc. The NSA is an organization that takes our information and claims to use it for our safety but in recent news it has been criticized as a cell phone infiltrator. That’s right, though most of you have already heard about this and likely lost interest in it, the fact remains that all of your data are belong to US(A).  It is no lie that:

The National Security Agency has provided timely information to U.S. decision makers and military leaders for more than half a century.

and that:

NSA/CSS exists to protect the Nation.

but where do we draw the line? Is it really in our liberty to discuss anything at all without being overlooked or guided? Is there any safe place for our information?

Related Article: Gossip Through the Prism

Apparently nowhere it seems, as a federal appeals court recently ruled that warrants are not needed for tracking cell phones. Yes, this is very serious. Serious because now all of my talks about kittens and dogs will be recorded and every conversation about “how life is going” with my mother will be documented. Joking aside, a lot of people feel threatened by the means of a government, and the display of power that one such government sometimes abuses. What will all this hacking of civilians information yield? Maybe it will help with criminals at large and terrorists that are on the loose. To think, a world where the NSA finds them and the police get them.

Related Article: The Drones Are Coming

In lighter news, NSA chief will soon be at a conference for hackers in Vegas where he will likely speak out about the data mining and collecting that the NSA does. Let him speak, but surely everything he says will be watched and scrutinized. In fact, all we can do is scrutinize and wait to see what the Supreme Court will do and how it will weigh in on the warrant-less tracking. Cheers! But don’t forget, Big Brother is always watching. Or reading, err tracking?

Related Article: Not Another 9-11 Article

 

Sources:

Time: NSA Chief Speaks

Freemasons

Gawker: Illuminati

Knights Templar

Central Intelligence Agency

National Security Agency

Youtube: All Your Base Are Belong To US

Warrantless Cellphone Tracking is Upheld

Wondergressive: Gossip Through the Prism

Wondergressive: Not Another 9-11 Article

Wondergressive: The Drones Are Coming

Conservation Efforts of Earth’s Seven Continents

Captain-Planet-Cartoon-Wallpaper Captain Planet conservation

Captain Planet and the Planeteers by Ted Turner

‘Mostly Harmless.’ The only entry in the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy used to read just ‘harmless,’ but after much careful deliberation and much intensive high-level editing, writer Ford Prefect was able to attach “Mostly” to Earth’s entry.

Since then segue writers (probably just me) of the world have attempted to relate the science fiction musings of the Great Wizard Douglas Adams to articles about global conservationism.

Speaking about global conservationism – funny you should even be thinking about that, I’ve compiled a list of conservation programs and projects from around the globe. You know, because when the NSA is watching you or your money is being spent on the military it’s nice to sit back, relax, use some comma splices, and learn about some good old-fashioned-down-to-earth wholesome people.

Related Article: The 5 R’s: Refuse, Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, and Rot

 

Africa

Oh sweet Africa! The continent of origin. A place both filled with beautiful landscapes and plagued by poverty, war and oppression. Despite the evils that happen there, there is quite a lot of good-natured conservation going on.

For example, I present the KAZA project. This project aims to connect portions of Angola, Botswana, Namibia, Zambia, and Zimbabwe in an effort to co-facilitate human and wildlife-life.

It’s the size of a European country. The inhabitants include 2.5 million people, a quarter of a million elephants, 3,000 species and some of the last hopes that Africa’s wildlife will endure the 21st century in substantial numbers.

writes Michael J. Coren. But despite all of the good that this project will likely achieve, some critics are a bit skeptical.

Some question whether or not the focus is in the right place

Critics are also concerned that the project may end up enriching foreign tourism companies rather than local communities.

But whether or not this can save the declining African wildlife, it is wonderful to see these nations working together to bring balance to the force. Lets just hope that their efforts are for good.

Related Article: The 5 R’s Follow Up 1: Refuse

 

Asia

In Indonesia, there are many many many forests. Ask two of our writers, editors, and big cheeses in chief. I’m sure that they could tell you all about it. But where there are forests there are paper mills, tooth pick factories, and beavers. Lots and lots of beavers.

In this case the beavers are corporate and have decided that the woods might be a bit more precious than they previously had thought.

After recieving a lot of flack- and rightfully so- for their destructively belligerent deforestation practices (dbdp for short), Asia Pulp & and Paper has put a hold on their farming of national forests. The company, which holds a substantial amount of private land, has decided to focus on farming renewable trees that they’ve grown. This comes as a significantly awesome change of pace from the fern gully-eske practices which they so loved.

Related Article: The Profound Intelligence and Intuition of Elephants

 

North America

Oh to be a cowboy crossing the Great Plains of the United States. As you load your riffle, the rail car (built by slaves, and migrant workers) bumps a bit in protest and some of your precious gun powder spills to the floor. No worries, though, this hunt is easy. You load your riffle, take aim, and fire a round. You believe that you’ve missed your target but in all actuality the bison has been downed.

This sort of reckless behavior is exactly what caused the decline of the North American Bison population. Manifest Destiny-ers(?) took the land and it’s bounty as theirs and theirs alone.

As cattle ranching and fenced-in farming became more and more popular so too did it become popular for the bison to die. The  pre-columbian Americas boasted a bison population of more than 60 million. In 1890 the population almost entirely died out. There were only 750 left. Now, with much effort, the population is stably rising with approximately 360,000 bison roaming the Americas.

Bison conservation efforts by organizations such as The American Bison Society have dramatically aided bison, buffalo and many other species in an attempt to rejuvenate endangered populations.

Related Article: GMO Labeling Going In Right Direction In The US

 

South America

Ahh sweet Guyana, the Caribbean nation of South America. Now, you’re about to witness a rare quoting of wikipedia and if this were a dos X meme it’d read something like this: I don’t always quote Wikipedia but when I do It’s about the biodiversity of the only English-speaking non-island Caribbean Nation in South America.

The following habitats have been categorised for Guyana: coastal, marine, littoral, estuarine palustrine, mangrove, riverine, lacustrine, swamp, savanna, white sand forest, brown sand forest, montane, cloud forest, moist lowland and dry evergreen scrub forests (NBAP, 1999). About 14 areas of biological interest have been identified as possible hotspots for a National Protected Area System.

Basically, Guyana is a wonderful paradise for nature’s plants and wildlife. It turns out nature thrives here for one simple reason: There aren’t very many humans living there. The population density of Guyana is 3.8 humans per square mile. That is single digits. To put that into perspective, The population density of Rio de Janeiro is 16,100 humans per square mile.

So not only does Guyana boast an incredibly low impact, the people that do live there want to keep it beautiful. The government is actively working to set conservation guidelines for when people find out about Guyana

The Government of Guyana, under the leadership of President Jagdeo, is taking major steps to protect its natural resources. In 2002, the government granted Conservation International (CI) the world’s first “conservation concession” to protect 81,000 hectares (200,000 acres) of primary rain forest in the Upper Essequibo watershed.

Related Article: Your Old Android Phone Can Save the Rainforest

 

Antarctica

In 1961 Japan, the U.S., the former Soviet Union, the U.K., France and several other countries agreed to “not do anything stupid in Antarctica“. The cleverly named Antarctic Treaty aims to:

to utilize the area for peaceful purposes only and prohibit to establish military bases and to carry out of the maneuvers, to promote the freedom of scientific investigation and cooperation in the area, not to assert, support or deny a claim to sovereignty or create any rights of sovereignty, and to prohibit any nuclear explosion and the disposing of radioactive materials.

Since that time, 36 other nations have signed onto the Antarctic Treaty.

Related Article: 2800 Year Old Lake Life Survives in Complete Isolation

 

Europe

Europe, the land of the conquerors, gypsies, and well-to-do aristocrats has much need for conservation. Because of its relatively high population density the types of conservation projects that go on here are a bit different. It seems that those wishing to do some good work have to really try hard to find areas to protect.

The EOCA is a conservation project base for those planeteers looking to help out in their own way. One project, focusing on the Alps, was successful in removing tons of unused metal from old ski lifts.

 From an abandoned ski re[s]ort, they took away about 50 tonnes of different waste materials. These included the remnants of ski lifts and a pile of concrete blocks – left from winter sport activities in the 1960’s and 70’s.  The slopes of the Montagne de Lure have been returned to a wild state, for the rare Orsini’s Viper, to allow the wild tulips and fritillaries to spread, and for the pleasure of its visitors.

Even in densely-packed Europe there are ways to protect the environment.

Related Article: Sweden is Running Out of Trash

 

Australia

And before I go on, I must take a second to marvel at how awesome it is that Australia is: an island, a continent, a nation and pretty bad-ass.

Down under, there are many conservation projects. The Tasmanian forests are dwindling. It’s a shame as they are a beautiful place. When you have a forest, you have people who would like nothing more than to chop it down to pulp for paper. The conservation of the Tasmanian Forests  comes amid

Growing concerns about the negative public perceptions of the logging of these forests and changes in the market have contributed to this decline and a loss of opportunity. The forest agreement is an attempt to break this downward spiral. It attempts to find a way to protect forests and protect people whose livelihoods are tied up with the forestry industry.  It seeks to open opportunity for the industry to move onto a more sustainable higher value path.

So many there is a way for both companies and people to work together to not completely destroy the world as we know it.

Related Article: The Effect of Agriculture on the Planet

Our Powers Combined…

 

Sources:

http://www.amazon.com/Ultimate-Hitchhikers-Guide-Galaxy/dp/0345453743/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1371569115&sr=1-1&keywords=ultimate+hitchhiker%27s+guide+to+the+galaxy

http://e360.yale.edu/feature/kaza_ambitious_africa_experiment_to_preserve_threatened_wildlife/2527/

http://www.fastcoexist.com/1680000/african-nations-team-up-to-create-a-nature-preserve-the-size-of-sweden

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Africa

http://www.kavangozambezi.org/index.php

http://www.greenbiz.com/news/2013/03/22/how-asia-pulp-paper-learned-put-down-chainsaw

http://www.wcs.org/saving-wildlife/hoofed-mammals/bison/the-american-bison-society.aspx

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_bison

http://www.newgeography.com/content/003438-the-evolving-urban-form-rio-de-janeiro

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/guyana/population-density-people-per-sq-km-wb-data.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guyana

http://www.conservation.org/where/south_america/guyana/Pages/guyana.aspx

http://www.env.go.jp/nature/nankyoku/kankyohogo_en/kankyo_en/hogo/kokusai/

http://www.ats.aq/e/ats.htm

http://www.acfonline.org.au/news-media/acf-opinion/forests-deal-only-solution

GMO Labeling Going In Right Direction In The US

http://dgchaacicgqa5.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/labeling-required-in.jpg

GMO Labeling World Map

GMO labeling finally got itself a small yet big win. Last week, Connecticut became the first state in the U.S. to pass a bill through the senate that would require mandatory labeling of all GMOs. There will be some understandable exceptions that would not have to label their food as a GMO, such as fast food restaurants and farmer’s markets. But come on, that’s not at bad start.

We’re not banning anything, we’re not restricting anything, we’re not taxing anything,

Senate Republican leader John McKinney said at a press conference.

We’re just saying let moms and dads know what’s in the food they’re buying for their young kids… That’s not a lot to ask.

Would the US food industry really suffer from this type of labeling?

Related Article: Mystery of the Dying/Disappearing Honeybees Solved

If you were to complain to a fast food restaurant manager that you found a hair in your hamburger, they would probably say that’s impossible, because they don’t use any natural ingredients! Joking of course, but you get the picture.

http://justlabelit.org/state-initiatives/

GMO Labeling Initiatives

Fortunately, there are other states in the union that are taking initiatives to make some sort of legislation for GMO labeling. As of this writing there are 29 states with initiatives for labeling of GMO products. You are able to find your own state group fighting for this initiative.

According to the polls taken from MSNBC in 2011, Reuters and Washington Post in 2010, Consumer Reports in 2008, and ABC News in 2001, 93-96% of Americans support GMO labeling. Also, according to justlabelit.org, GMO labeling is required in 64 countries worldwide. This includes most of the developed nations, exceptions being the United States of course, and Canada.

Related Article: The Senate is Useless and Should be Dismantled 

If you are interested in seeing the whole world map of where GMO labeling is required, head over to the Center For Food Safety website.

There are only five countries in Europe that do not require labeling of GMOs. Those are Bosnia, Albania, Macedonia, Serbia, and Moldova. Serbia, however, is the exception in the group because it actually has an official ban on GMO imports and cultivation! Benin and Zambia, two countries in the African continent, are the only other countries in the world that have an official ban on importing and cultivation of GMOs.

Related Article: Don’t Fear Anti-GM Hysteria (Nor the Reaper)!

 

http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/ge-map/

GMO Labeling In Europe

 

Sources:

http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/

http://justlabelit.org

http://www.ctpost.com/local/article/State-Senate-approves-genetic-labeling-4534999.php

http://justlabelit.org/right-to-know/labeling-around-the-world/

http://justlabelit.org/state-initiatives/

http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/ge-map/

http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/issues/976/ge-food-labeling/us-polls-on-ge-food-labeling

https://wondergressive.com/2013/04/20/united-states-senate-is-useless/

https://wondergressive.com/2013/03/28/dont-fear-the-reaper-or-anti-gm-propaganda/

https://wondergressive.com/2012/10/10/mystery-of-the-dyingdisappearing-honeybees-solved/

Germany Sets Example for Global Climate Battle

Energiewende! This one word defines the German view on the global climate crisis that our planet is currently experiencing. Literally Energiewende means energy change. While its definition is simple it’s connotation encompasses an entire movement. Osha Gray Davidson writes:

The government has set a target of 80 percent renewable power by 2050, but many Germans I spoke with in three weeks traveling across this country believe 100 percent renewable power is achievable by then.

This plan also has many checkpoint gates that it must achieve. By 2020 Germany must be dependent on 35% renewable energies. These energies include wind, solar, and sheer German momentum. Sheer German momentum believes strongly that the Earth is experiencing a global climate crisis.

If a member of parliament called climate change a hoax or said that its cause is unknown, he or she would be laughed out of office.

 

Interesting. Here in the United States, we’re still trying to accept the idea of climate change. For example, my favorite winter-time joke: Where’s that dang-old global warming when you need it? (note: this joke is best told when temperatures are under 41°F and is best told by or to somebody who doesn’t properly understand what global warming is). As another example, lets see what the US Chief of Energy has to say about the matter.

Let me make it very clear that there is no ambiguity in terms of the scientific basis calling for a prudent response on climate change.

Ernest Moniz goes on to say:

“I am not interested in debating what is not debatable…There is plenty to debate as we try and move forward on our climate agenda.”

While it is good that the Energy Chief (a tittle best held by a true sorcerer) strongly holds this as fact, there are still many United Statians (I think it’s time we stopped calling ourselves Americans as we live on only a part of the continent) that uphold the belief that Global warming is a myth. If you really want to delve into crazy, I suggest you check out the Friends of Science webpage.

As we move back to the realms of science and reality we can see that the majority of the world understands science and actually is pretty good friends with it. Stanford University is spearheading the global awareness of climate change caused by humans (scroll down to page 26 for the good stuff). Don’t forget to sign the petition!

Sources:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-11-13/germany-has-built-clean-energy-economy-u-s-rejected-in-80s.html?cmpid=otbrn.sustain.story

http://phys.org/news/2013-05-scientists-co2-sequestration-technique-supergreen.html

http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/301287-new-energy-secretary-need-to-address-climate-change-not-debatable

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/05/23/1211224/-520-scientists-sign-statement-on-Maintaining-Humanity-s-Life-Support-Systems-in-the-21st-Century

http://www.economist.com/node/21559667

http://www.friendsofscience.org/index.php?ide=2

http://www.globalwarminghysteria.com/ten-myths-of-global-warming/
http://mahb.stanford.edu/consensus-statement-from-global-scientists/
http://mahb.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Consensus-Statement.pdf

Other Wondergressive Articles:

The ugly face of overpopulation 

The 5 Rs

Sweden is running out of trash