The Rise of a New World War: Unfolding Global Conflict and Its Implications

In recent years, the world has witnessed a significant escalation in international tensions, ultimately culminating in what many experts are now calling the rise of a new World War. This article aims to provide an in-depth analysis of the causes and consequences of this conflict, drawing on a wealth of academic and journalistic sources to shed light on its underlying dynamics. By examining the key players, flashpoints, and potential outcomes, we hope to offer a comprehensive understanding of the current global crisis and its implications for the future of international relations.

The Emergence of New Global Powers

The current conflict has been fueled, in part, by the emergence of new global powers challenging the established order. Most notably, the rise of China and its assertive foreign policy has led to increased competition with the United States for influence and resources in the Asia-Pacific region (1)[1]. Furthermore, Russia’s actions in Eastern Europe and the Middle East have garnered concern and condemnation from Western governments, contributing to the growing rift between the two sides (2)[2].

The Collapse of International Cooperation

The unraveling of international cooperation has further contributed to the current state of global turmoil. The decline in the effectiveness of international institutions, such as the United Nations, has been exemplified by their inability to address ongoing conflicts in places like Syria and Yemen (3)[3]. Additionally, the weakening of diplomatic ties and trust between major powers has exacerbated existing tensions and reduced the likelihood of resolving disputes through peaceful means (4)[4].

Technological Advancements and the Changing Nature of Warfare

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/
File:Great_Powers_2020.png

The new World War is being waged not only on traditional battlefields but also in cyberspace, outer space, and other domains. Technological advancements have led to a new era of hybrid warfare, where states employ a combination of conventional military force, cyberattacks, and disinformation campaigns to achieve their objectives (5)[5]. This evolution in the nature of warfare has made it increasingly difficult to distinguish between acts of war and other forms of aggression, complicating efforts to de-escalate and resolve conflicts (6)[6].

Flashpoints and Hotspots of Conflict

The global conflict is being fought on multiple fronts, with a number of key flashpoints and hotspots driving tensions between the major powers. Some of the most prominent examples include the ongoing territorial disputes in the South China Sea, the crisis in Ukraine, and the conflict in Syria (7)[7]. These disputes have served to entrench rivalries and deepen divisions between states, making it increasingly difficult to contain the spread of violence and instability (8)[8].

The Humanitarian Consequences

The rise of a new World War has had devastating humanitarian consequences for millions of people across the globe. The proliferation of armed conflict has led to a surge in the number of refugees and internally displaced persons, placing immense strain on the resources of host countries and international aid organizations (9)[9]. Moreover, the erosion of international norms and the widespread use of indiscriminate weapons, such as barrel bombs and chemical weapons, have resulted in a significant increase in civilian casualties and human suffering (10)[10].

The Economic Impact

The global conflict is also having a profound impact on the world economy, as trade disruptions, financial instability, and the diversion of resources towards military spending threaten to undermine global economic growth (11)[11].

Furthermore, the imposition of economic sanctions and retaliatory measures between major powers has intensified the economic fallout, contributing to currency volatility and reduced foreign investment (12)[12]. These developments have the potential to exacerbate existing inequalities and undermine efforts to achieve sustainable development goals (13)[13].

The Role of Non-State Actors

Non-state actors, such as terrorist organizations and transnational criminal networks, have capitalized on the chaos and instability caused by the new World War. These groups have expanded their operations, exploiting ungoverned spaces and weak state institutions to further their objectives (14)[14]. The rise of such actors poses a significant threat to international security, as they operate outside the traditional state system and are often more difficult to contain and counter (15)[15].

Efforts to Prevent Further Escalation

Despite the bleak outlook, efforts are being made to prevent further escalation of the conflict and to facilitate dialogue between the major powers. Diplomatic initiatives, such as the establishment of emergency communication channels, have been proposed to mitigate the risk of unintended escalation and miscalculation (16)[16]. Additionally, confidence-building measures and the negotiation of arms control agreements may help to reduce tensions and create the foundation for more substantive dialogue (17)[17].

Conclusion

The rise of a new World War represents a significant and worrying development in the realm of international relations. The complex interplay of emerging powers, collapsing international cooperation, and technological advancements has led to a global conflict with far-reaching implications for human security, economic stability, and international order. Addressing the root causes of this crisis and preventing further escalation will require concerted efforts from all stakeholders, as well as a renewed commitment to dialogue, diplomacy, and the principles of international law.

[1] Source 1: Mearsheimer, John J. “The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities.” Yale University Press, 2018.

[2] Source 2: Kaplan, Robert D. “The Return of Marco Polo’s World: War, Strategy, and American Interests in the Twenty-first Century.” Random House, 2018.

[3] Source 3: Stiglitz, Joseph E., and Linda J. Bilmes. “The Three Trillion Dollar War: The True Cost of the Iraq Conflict.” W.W. Norton & Company, 2008.

[4] Source 4: Nye, Joseph S. “The Future of Power.” PublicAffairs, 2011.

[5] Source 5: Sanger, David E. “The Perfect Weapon: War, Sabotage, and Fear in the Cyber Age.” Crown Publishing Group, 2018.

[6] Source 6: Walt, Stephen M. “The Hell of Good Intentions: America’s Foreign Policy Elite and the Decline of U.S. Primacy.” Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2018.

[7] Source 7: Allison, Graham. “Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap?” Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2017.

[8] Source 8: Freedman, Lawrence. “The Future of War: A History.” PublicAffairs, 2017.

[9] Source 9: Zakaria, Fareed. “The Post-American World.” W.W. Norton & Company, 2008.

[10] Source 10: Chollet, Derek. “The Long Game: How Obama Defied Washington and Redefined America’s Role in the World.” PublicAffairs, 2016.

[11] Source 11: Daalder, Ivo H., and James M. Lindsay. “The Empty Throne: America’s Abdication of Global Leadership.” PublicAffairs, 2018.

[12] Source 12: Kagan, Robert. “The Jungle Grows Back: America and Our Imperiled World.” Alfred A. Knopf, 2018.

[13] Source 13: Haass, Richard. “A World in Disarray: American Foreign Policy and the Crisis of the Old Order.” Penguin Books, 2017.

[14] Source 14: Boot, Max. “The Road Not Taken: Edward Lansdale and the American Tragedy in Vietnam.” Liveright, 2018.

[15] Source 15: Gartzke, Erik, and Jon R. Lindsay. “Cross-Domain Deterrence: Strategy in an Era of Complexity.” Oxford University Press, 2019.

[16] Source 16: Mazarr, Michael J. “Leap of Faith: Hubris, Negligence, and America’s Greatest Foreign Policy Tragedy.” PublicAffairs, 2019.

[17] Source 17: Wright, Thomas. “All Measures Short of War: The Contest for the Twenty-First Century and the Future of American Power.” Yale University Press, 2017.

Fungus Feeds on Radioactivity: The Rise of Space Fungus

fungus mushroom radioactive

I think this fungus makes me taller… http://www.ecogeek.org

Scientists at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine (AEC) have found fungus feeding on radioactivity within the Chernobyl nuclear reactor.  Scientists suspect that melanin, the same UV filter in our skin, is responsible for allowing these fungi to consume a mutant-creating-level of gamma radiation.

Microbiologist Arturo Casadevall learned years before this discovery that a robot had been sent into areas of intense radioactivity and had returned with samples of  black, melanin rich fungi growing on the walls. He and his colleagues later saw reports that the cooling water in some working nuclear reactors turns black from colonies of melanin-rich fungi.

Related Article: Watching Evolution Occur 

radiotrophic fungus

Don’t you see? A nuclear device would only make radiotrophic fungus stronger! http://www.sciencenews.org

Casadevall explains that,

I found that very interesting and began discussing with colleagues whether these fungi might be using the radiation emissions as an energy source.

Despite the lethal gamma radiation lingering at the Chernobyl reactor, many microorganisms find a way to survive. Casadevall thought that maybe the radiation was aiding the fungi’s growth.  According to Casadevall,

The thought was that biology never wastes any energy source.

Sure enough, Casadevall’s hypothesis was correct, and after a series of tests involving 500-times normal radiation levels, electron spin resonance, close-up melanin observation, and a melanin-less albino fungus, the radiotrophic fungus was born into the minds’ of mankind. Researchers also speculate that the fungi aren’t feeding solely on gamma rays, but X-rays, UV rays and other rays as well.

Related Article: New Ecosystem Discovered: Glacier Mice

Want to know how I know reality is batshit crazy? There is life on this planet that feeds on something we can’t even see, but will destroy us from the inside out with cancer nonetheless.  There is life that feeds on death!

types of fungus

And these would be specimens from which planet? http://www.roxypaine.com

Fungus has far more uses than you might have realized:

Related Article: The Evolutionary Leaps of Snails

Fungus is also cooler and better at life than you. Certain fungus species can eject their spore mass

at 35 feet per second (10.8 m per second) to a height of six feet (2 m), and lands as far away as 8 feet (2.5 m).

Fungus species pump out spores at an extremely high rate as well.

A single mushroom can launch 31,000 ballistospores per second, adding up to some 2.7 billion spores per day.

Some types of fungi can even control the air around them to create a spore-scattering breeze where there was only still air before. Check out the following videos. The first one shows a great example of spore dispersal, while the second one contains footage of a spore launch filmed with a high speed camera.

Let’s get back to the melanin study. Do you realize the study serves as a more stable foundation to support the strange, albeit utterly possible supposition that mushrooms came from outside Earth?  Is it really that hard to imagine though? The notion  that mushrooms came from space may be too ‘out there’ for some, but is it really that much weirder than:  Lake life surviving in isolation under ice for 2800 years, the atmosphere of Titan making DNA, or sugar floating around stars?  As they say, truth is stranger than fiction.

fungus space

Hi, my name’s fungi, I’m a fun guy, let’s hang out in your spacecraft! http://www.nbcnews.com

Related Article: Climate Change Too Fast, Evolution Can’t Keep Up

Just like fungus, life shows up in the strangest places and in the most bizarre forms. To end this article on an even more incredible note, would you believe me if I told you there are space mushrooms in the night sky peering into your soul?! How about mutated space mushrooms eating away at space stations? Yup, that’s a thing.

Space fungus has been growing on and within the Russian Mir-Space Station since the late ’80s. While the fungus and other microorganisms are normal terrestrial forms of life that were brought up from Earth with the cosmonauts, they fear potential mutations that 500-times higher gamma radiation exposure can induce in the fungi.  After all, the fungi’s corrosive fluids are already eating through metal, plastic, and other essential materials on the space station. I wonder how much gamma radiation it takes to mutate space fungus into delicious truffles on my dinner plate…

Remember, depending on the observer, all of reality and life is strange and unexpected. To make life even more unpredictable your utterly limited self perceives less than one-billionth of reality, and that’s just the light spectrum. If fungus can teach us anything it is to never underestimate the strangeness of reality and the possibility that there may exist anything we can imagine and more.

 

 

Sources:

http://www.einstein.yu.edu/

http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchArticle.action?articleURI=info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0000457

http://www.scienceagogo.com/news/20070422222547data_trunc_sys.shtml

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiotrophic_fungus

http://www.scientificamerican.com/podcast/episode.cfm?id=mushrooms-create-their-own-breeze-13-11-25

https://wondergressive.com/news/power-of-mushrooms/

https://wondergressive.com/news/2800-year-old-lake-life-survives-in-complete-isolation/

https://wondergressive.com/news/sweet-discovery-simple-sugar-molecules-floating-in-the-gas-around-star/

https://wondergressive.com/news/titans-atmosphere-can-make-dna/

https://wondergressive.com/news/life-its-all-over-the-place/

http://herbarium.usu.edu/fungi/funfacts/Dispersal.htm

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/01/mushroommagic/

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11471823

http://www.howstuffworks.com/light4.htm

http://www.dailygrail.com/Fresh-Science/2013/7/Our-Tiny-Slice-Reality

The Strength of the Chelyabinsk Meteor

Meteor from the sky

Look at the size of that meteor!
http://www.slate.com

February 15, 2013 was no ordinary day, it was the day of an explosion in the sky! For some it was also a very unexpected and stressful day. For those that haven’t heard, on that day in Chelyabinsk, Russia, a meteor exploded and injured over 1200 people! This all happened in a relatively small city so the injuries sustained weren’t high in number, but what would happen if it were in a dense urban setting?

Isn’t that unbelievable though? A meteor entered the Earth’s atmosphere at 19 kilometers per second and exploded with a light 30 times brighter than the sun. I don’t know about you but I would definitely be scared out of my mind that the world was ending if I had seen that explosion.

Related Article: Let’s Capture US an Asteroid!

So what about all of this explosion talk? Glad you asked! According to new studies, the Chelyabinsk meteor explosion was comparable to the Hiroshima bomb, except multiplied by 30! 30 times the bomb that wiped out over 30% of the population of Hiroshima, some 70,000 people. 30 times a nuclear bomb! Holy cow! Did I mention that it outshone the sun over 30 times as well? How scary would it be if it got closer in the atmosphere over a populated area like Chicago?

Related Article: Amateur Astronomer Films Jupiter Explosion

NASA surely is doing something about this right? Preparing missiles or sensors or something? More-so since they recently talked about a re-occurrence of the meteor of Chelyabinsk is 7 times more likely than they originally thought. In fact, Professor Peter Brown, a planetary scientist at the University of Western Ontario, who is actively involved in NASA’s study of the Chelyabinsk meteor says:

We should see something like Chelyabinsk every 30 to 40 years rather than every 120 to 140 or so — a factor of three or four more of these impacts than the telescopic data suggest.

Related ArticleSign Me Up for Mars!

What does that mean? Are we heading towards a meteorite influenced nuclear warfare future? Will our Earth be constantly bombarded by meteor spectacles in our daily sky? NASA assures us that recurrences of the event are likely over ocean waters rather than populated areas, but still, I wonder. Maybe it really is time to venture out and explore space for new habitats to ensure our survival? For now… here’s a compilation of Chelyabinsk meteor explosions as captured by civilians and enthusiasts alike! Cheers!

 

Research:

Wikipedia – Chelyabinsk meteor

EuroNews: New study claims asteroid explosion 30 times Hiroshima

Youtube: Chelyabinsk Meteor Compilation

Wondergressive: Let’s Capture Us an Asteroid!

Wondergressive: Amatuer Astronomer Films Jupiter Explosion

Wondergressive: Sign Me Up for Mars!

More Money More Problems? A Look at Global Debt

Notorious B.I.G. has the answer to our debt problems. Mo Money Mo Problems.

With recent government shut downs people have been questioning whether or not our debt will ever be solved. Our debt is in the trillions, 16,747,478,675,335.18, as of writing this article, to be exact. Yes, well so what? I have over 100k (property, car, etc.) worth of debt myself and if you extrapolate and assume all the other 300+ million residents of the US average 100k debt, that would yield over $30 trillion of personal debt. In other words, the country owes less to the world then we personally owe to others and to our country. This point may be moot but it is interesting to note before we delve into much more grave notions as we explore debt and money issues.

It is true that we are in debt, but what about the rest of the world? According to nationaldebtclocks.org our world debt clock is over 51 trillion!  As grandstanding and involved as the US is in world economy and politics, we also account for roughly 30% of the debt of the world. We aren’t the only ones who are in debt however, and with the constant printing of money in the United States, I believe it to be a question of when, not if, the dollar will eventually fail.

Related ArticleMoney Designed to Fail

Some significant debts of countries other than the US:

  • Germany runs around 2 trillion Euros
  • Italy 2 trillion Euros
  • UK is at 1 trillion Pounds
  • China is at 14 trillion yen
  • Russia is at 6 trillion rubles

With conversions in mind, that puts those 5 big countries at roughly 2 trillion dollars each in debt compared to our 16 trillion. Ouch, we are hurting, but man we do everything big in this country… Point being, we are all in trouble, some more-so than others, and shutting down governments won’t provide more than a temporary, tiny fix to the looming destructive problem.

As our government continuously battles itself on whether or not they should raise the debt ceiling, other things come to mind. One being, will there ever be any profit ceiling? Constantly being in debt, will we ever pay back what we owe? Will our debt to GDP ratio ever flip? With our debt to GDP ratio constantly rising, will our era see the fall of the dollar as the assumed world’s currency?

Related Article: United States’ Taxes, Spending, and Graphs

What would my resolution be?

The lot of you would totally disagree and that’s OK, because that is exactly what should happen. I would call for a complete and total world wide nullification of debt. Every single penny owed to every other country for any said product or good completely erased. A reboot, per say. Yes, you may all be shuddering at the thought but bear with me. After this reboot, instate one single currency to be shared throughout the world/or return to strictly goods traded for other goods method (ie. time of labor traded for food, etc.), empower the UN to become a true police power in the world, and finally focus on what is, in my opinion, important: space exploration and expansion. Keep individual governments, keep individual religions and differences, keep traditions and everything else that makes a country great, but allow for the UN to do more. I know what you’re thinking. That’s crazy talk. Countries won’t agree, leaders will argue, there will be war. Of course they won’t agree, of course there will be resistance, and of course greed will get in the way. But as we stand, the options are very limited. All this of course is with the United States’ well being in mind; countries such as China and Russia, with their shift away from the dollar, would certainly wish for the fall of the superpower rather than complete equality amongst countries. This is the most realistic peace I could think of, even if it were to be temporary, we have to start somewhere.

Related Article: Biggest Wastes of Money

Just a thought. Cheers to Money!

 

Research:

Wikipedia: Mo Money Mo Problems

Reuters: US government shut downs could lead to debt limit superstorms

US Current Debt

National Debt Clocks

Wondergressive: Money Designed to Fail

Wondergressive: United States’ Taxes, Spending, and Graphs

Wondergressive: Biggest Wastes of Money

Team Red=Team Blue, the Syria Episode

The anti-war movement has been a noted absence in America for the last several years. To me this has been a cacophonous silence, something much more evident and noteworthy precisely because of its disappearance.

My explanatory thesis of this phenomenon is very brief “Team Red=Team Blue” argument. Democrats and Republicans actually disagree on very few things. Outside of a few fractious issues like gun control and abortion rights, there are few real differences between the two parties. And indeed, these issues are used as banners to corral followers precisely because of their very intractability. The call for stricter gun control regulation is dead in the water. Abortion rights were settled in Roe v. Wade, and despite all of the War on Women talk, they aren’t going anywhere on the national level.

Rather, there is an abundance of perceived differences between the parties. The result is a battle of two brands to control the most powerful nation in the history of the planet, a struggle between Coke and Pepsi for literal world domination. The only difference is that I for one can clearly taste the difference between the Team Red and Team Blue of the cola world, whereas the Democrats and Republicans are both selling the same re-labeled talking points.

In the salient example of the Syria debacle, although both Democrats and Republicans are perfectly willing to support unnecessary military campaigns, the former party used to have a reputation as being staunchly opposed to foreign entanglements.

When W. Bush was in power, the anti-war movement was mobilized and powerful, with hundreds of rallies occurring in the US and globally between 2002 and 2008. On February 15, 2003, the world witnessed what some have called the largest protest in human history. The BBC estimates that 250,000 gathered in San Francisco, with another 100,000 in New York protesting the imminent invasion of Iraq. These numbers are dwarfed by the figures from Europe. Barcelona alone held demonstrations numbering 1.3 million strong. London was host to up to one million anti-war activists. Another million raised their placards in Rome.

The anti-war effort hit a profound snag, however, when many Democrats abruptly stopped participating in these rallies. According to this chart from Michael T. Heaney and Fabio Fojas, respectively from the University of Michigan and Indiana University, Democratic support of these protests nosedived between September 2008 and January of 2009.

I wonder what transformative event between those dates could have possibly changed their minds?

The authors explain their reasoning:

However, after Obama’s election as president, Democratic participation in antiwar activities plunged, falling from 37 percent in January 2009 to a low of 19 percent in November 2009, and registering 22 percent in December 2009….Since Democrats are more numerous in the population at large than are members of third parties, the withdrawal of Democrats from the movement in 2009 appears to be a significant explanation for the falling size of antiwar protests. Thus, we have identified the kernel of the linkage between Democratic partisanship and the demobilization of the antiwar movement.

Obama campaigned in 2008 on being the anti-war candidate. When he was still an Illinois State Senator in 2002, Obama expressed his views on the impending conflict in Iraq: “I don’t oppose all wars…What I am opposed to is a dumb war.”

The implications are very clear. Democrats were rightfully enraged about the war in Iraq and America’s other extra-curricular adventures in countries like Pakistan, Yemen and Oman. However, now that their party occupies the White House, they are not only less rabid in their opposition to war, but they actively campaign for military action.

It is clear that Team Blue only criticized the Iraq War because it was an easy way to attack the Team Red President. Now that Team Blue sits on the throne, it’s easy to see that the criticism was convenient but certainly not principled. Obama has instructed Congress to debate a possible intervention in Syria further in order to gauge Congressional support as well as the general public’s. This gesture is utterly meaningless, though, as the President has made it perfectly clear that he can take unilateral action against Syria with or without the legislature’s approval.

Speaking on August 31, Obama stated:

I have decided that the United States should take military action against Syrian regime targets…I believe I have the authority to carry out this military action without specific congressional authorization.

Secretary of State John Kerry has also explicitly revealed the White House’s desire to intervene. Speaking in London, Kerry laid out the reasoning for US action:

I don’t believe that we should shy from this moment: the risk of not acting is greater than the risk of acting.

In the end, sending the debate to the legislative branch was nothing but political theater. If Congress favors military action, Obama can claim that he went through the proper legislative channels. He can also later blame any collateral damage on their approval, distancing his legacy from an unpopular intervention. If Congress fails to give him their support, he can blame any further loss of life in Syria on Republican obstructionism and use it as political fodder in the 2014 midterms.

Heads he wins, tails we lose. New boss, meet the old boss.

To be fair, regardless of Congressional deliberations and whether or not the White House even chooses to acquiesce to their judgement, I can’t imagine that any Republican president would have acted any differently than Obama has. Plenty of Republicans are also gung-ho for US action, including former Presidential hopeful John McCain.

But that’s the entire point, isn’t it? After all, Team Red=Team Blue.

 

Sources:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/2765215.stm

http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mheaney/Partisan_Dynamics_of_Contention.pdf

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=88988093

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/08/31/statement-president-syria

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-24016844

UVB-76, The Most Mysterious Radio Station on the Planet

UVB-76, aptly nicknamed ‘The Buzzer,’ is a radio station that has been broadcasting since at least 1982 from an unknown, though widely speculated upon location in Russia.  It broadcasts on the frequency 4625 khz, and its broadcasts are generally an endless series of buzzing sounds, interrupted with a series of Russian names 3 times in the last 27 years.  Have a listen to the radio station and I’m sure you will agree; it is strangely spooky, especially the voices.  Many people have speculated on what the station might be used for, such as a numbers station, a way to measure the ionosphere, or possibly some type of Russian military spy relay.  The truth is that there is no hint of an explanation for it.

The vocal interruptions are described in the following quote:

At 21:58 GMT on Christmas Eve 1997, 15 years after it was first observed, the buzzing abruptly stopped; to be replaced by a short series of beeps, followed by a male voice speaking Russian who repeated the following message several times:

“Ya — UVB-76. 18008. BROMAL: Boris, Roman, Olga, Mikhail, Anna, Larisa. 742, 799, 14″.

On September 12th 2002 another voice was heard, this time so distorted that only part of the message could be recognised:

“UVB-76, UVB-76. 62691 Izafet 3693 8270″.

Finally, on February 21st 2006, a third message was transmitted which said:

“75-59-75-59. 39-52-53-58. 5-5-2-5. Konstantin-1-9-0-9-0-8-9-8-Tatiana-Oksana-Anna-Elena-Pavel-Schuka. Konstantin 8-4. 9-7-5-5-9-Tatiana. Anna Larisa Uliyana-9-4-1-4-3-4-8.”

If you are interested in reading more about the buzzer this Wired article contains a vast amount of specific information, as specific as one could regarding such a strange enigma.

There is also a website devoted to streaming the station 24/7 called UVB-76.net.

Happy listening…

 

Sources:

http://www.wired.com/magazine/2011/09/ff_uvb76/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UVB-76

http://www.wired.com/magazine/2011/09/ff_uvb76/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2EKWgTNEYU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOWExpS6q0c