U.K. Government’s Chief Advisor on Drugs Policy Fired For Pointing Out the Danger of Alcohol and Tobacco

Professor David Nutt, the U.K. Government’s Chief Advisor on Drugs Policy, was sacked for revealing the intense dangers of alcohol and cigarettes and the relative safety of cannabis and ecstasy.  I recently posted an article regarding Professor David Nutt’s research regarding the dangers of alcohol in which he asks why alcohol isn’t illegal if relatively harmless drugs are.

This is a show of blatant disregard for science and scientific insight.  Despite what the U.K.’s scientific councils advised the government regarding the safety of said drugs and the necessary changes of the current policy, they went ahead and did the opposite. Scientists have time and time again been deliberately ignored.  The scientific community is understandably outraged.

Professor Nutt is calling the Prime Minister as irrational, and stressing that the position of politicians on drugs is focused on morals, and devoid of scientific evidence.

Like many governments around the world, this is proof that their focus is on profit rather than public safety, public want, and rationality.

 

U.K. Chief Advisor on Drug Policy Fired For Showing Danger of Alcohol and Tobacco

Professor David Nutt, the U.K. Government’s Chief Advisor on Drugs Policy, was sacked for revealing the intense dangers of alcohol and cigarettes and the relative safety of cannabis and ecstasy.  In this article discussing Professor David Nutt’s research of the dangers of alcohol in he asks why alcohol isn’t illegal if relatively harmless drugs are.

This is a show of blatant disregard for science and scientific insight.  Despite what the U.K.’s scientific councils advised the government regarding the safety of said drugs and the necessary changes of the current policy, they went ahead and did the opposite. Scientists have time and time again been deliberately ignored.  The scientific community is understandably outraged.

Professor Nutt is calling the Prime Minister as irrational, and stressing that the position of politicians on drugs is focused on morals, and devoid of scientific evidence.

Like many governments around the world, this is proof that their focus is on profit rather than public safety, public want, and rationality.

 

Sources

BBC News 

If Alcohol Were Discovered Today Would it Be Legal?

David Nutt: Drugs-without the hot air

Huffington Post: Finally, Drug Education Gets Real: Drugs – Without the Hot Air

The Economist: Reefer Madness Plain Speaking on a Highly Coloured Issue

If Alcohol Were Discovered Today Would it Be Legal?

 

That is the question Professor David Nutt from Cambridge University has asked his country.  Alcohol is undoubtedly the most widespread, destructive drug on the planet, and yet, it is socially accepted and even encouraged in nearly every culture.

Professor Nutt begins by pointing out that in many people’s minds alcohol is not even a drug.  When people ingest alcohol they get drunk, yet, when they ingest any other ‘drug’ they get high.  Society has classified alcohol as something completely different than any other mind altering substance.  It is harmless, and only a problem for a remote minority of the world.

This is simply not true.

Professor Nutt points out the annual statistics concerning Alcohol in the UK alone:

  • 40,000 deaths, including 350 just from acute alcohol poisoning and 8,000 from cirrhosis of the liver. More than a million hospital admissions in 2007/8 (including 13,000 under-18s), costing the NHS £2.7 billion.
  • 7,000 road traffic accidents, including 500 deaths.
  • 1.2 million violent incidents and 500,000 crimes, costing the police £7 billion. In addition:
  • 40% of domestic violence cases involve alcohol, as well as 50% of child protection cases.
  • 3.5 million adults in the UK are addicted, and up to 700,000 children live with a parent with a drink problem. 6,000 children a year are born with fetal alcohol syndrome each year.
  • Globally, the main burden of disease in 15- to 24-year-old males is due to alcohol, outweighing unsafe sex, illicit drug use, and physical accidents combined.
  • The total economic cost has been calculated as £30 billion a year – though some calculations estimate it may be as high as £55 billion.

Does this sound like a substance society should be lining the super market shelves with?  Professor Nutt explains that the alcohol industry is much to blame for the double think we practice regarding alcohol.

In rebuttal to negative rhetoric regarding alcohol, the industries always find a way to defend themselves.  The major points of argument/propoganda are:

  1. Consuming alcohol is normal, common, healthy and very responsible.
  2. The damage done by alcohol is caused by a small group of deviants who cannot handle alcohol.
  3. Normal adult non-drinkers do not, in fact, exist.
  4. Ignore the fact that alcohol is a harmful and addictive chemical substance (ethanol) for the body.
  5. Alcohol problems can only be solved when all parties work together.
  6. Alcohol marketing is not harmful. It is simply intended to assist the consumer in selecting a certain product or brand.
  7. Education about responsible use is the best method to protect society from alcohol problems.

With a copious amount of information, Professor Nutt explains the fallacies of each of these statements in detail.  Alcohol is undoubtedly dangerous for those who drink and those that choose not to.

It’s time to rethink all substances.  We need a paradigm shift in the way we view drugs and medicine.  A shift that involves science and experience, rather than profits and hysteria.

Alcohol Discovered Today: Would it Still be Legal?

alcohol fail

The wonderful world of alcohol. http://www.failhero.com

That is the question Professor David Nutt from Cambridge University has asked his country.  Alcohol is undoubtedly the most widespread, destructive drug on the planet, and yet, it is socially accepted and even encouraged in nearly every culture.

Professor Nutt begins by pointing out that in many people’s minds alcohol is not even a drug.  When people ingest it they get drunk, yet, when they ingest any other ‘drug’ they get high.  Society has classified alcohol as something completely different than any other mind altering substance.  It is harmless, and only a problem for a remote minority of the world.

This is simply not true.

Professor Nutt points out the alarming annual statistics in the UK alone:

  • 40,000 deaths, including 350 just from acute poisoning and 8,000 from cirrhosis of the liver. More than a million hospital admissions in 2007/8 (including 13,000 under-18s), costing the NHS £2.7 billion.
  • 7,000 road traffic accidents, including 500 deaths.
  • 1.2 million violent incidents and 500,000 crimes, costing the police £7 billion. In addition:
  • 40% of domestic violence cases involve alcohol, as well as 50% of child protection cases.
  • 3.5 million adults in the UK are addicted, and up to 700,000 children live with a parent with a drink problem. 6,000 children a year are born with fetal alcohol syndrome each year.
  • Globally, the main burden of disease in 15- to 24-year-old males is due to alcohol, outweighing unsafe sex, illicit drug use, and physical accidents combined.
  • The total economic cost has been calculated as £30 billion a year – though some calculations estimate it may be as high as £55 billion.

Does this sound like a substance society should be lining the super market shelves with?  Professor Nutt explains that the alcohol industry is much to blame for the double think we practice regarding the substance we love so much. In rebuttal to negative rhetoricl, the industries always find a way to defend themselves.

The European Centre for Monitoring Alcohol Marketing recently published a report called the Seven Key Messages of the Alcohol Industry,

and they are as follows:

  • Consuming alcohol is normal, common, healthy and very responsible.
  • The damage done by alcohol is caused by a small group of deviants who cannot handle it.
  • Normal adult non-drinkers do not, in fact, exist.
  • Ignore the fact that alcohol is harmful and addictive chemical substance (ethanol) for the body.
  • Marketing is not harmful. It is simply intended to assist the consumer in selecting a certain product or brand.
  • Education about responsible use is the best method to protect society from drinking problems.

With a copious amount of information, Professor Nutt explains the fallacies of each of these statements in detail.  Alcohol is undoubtedly dangerous for those who drink and those that choose not to.

It’s time to rethink all substances.  We need a paradigm shift in the way we view drugs and medicine.  A shift that involves science and experience, rather than profits and hysteria.

 

Sources:

AlterNet: If Alcohol Were Discovered Today, Would it be Legal?

Professor Nutt: Drugs – without the hot air

Huffington Post: Finally, Drug Education Gets Real: Drugs – Without the Hot Air

The Economist: Reefer Madness Plain Speaking on a Highly Coloured Issue